male genital torture

Male instructors torture a nude girl outdoors


Sexy Bianca seduces two horny bisexuals and enjoys pussy licking and ramming from their dicks
sexy hunks
Cock loving black gay Curious rides on top to cram his tight ass with a meaty cock
gay statistics
Slim brunette gay Ashley rubbing his big schlong in bedroom
gay truckers
Young black gay wrapping his sexy lips on huge ebony cock.
gay ebony sex
All the gay brothers in the neighborhood get together for an orgy
gay brothers
Hottie bald gay Lance jerking off his monster phallus on the couch
gay barebacking
This blond babe loves army men
gay army men
Tattooed and tanned gay couple obscenely ass reaming in an outdoor picnic galore.
gay simpsons
Slutty blonde shemales fucking on the couch
male dildo fucking
Graceful model poses nude in sexy lacy stockings
teen model nude
Lustful swingers make love together
swingers tales
Sexy mature women Eve and Eva taking turns in spreading wide to take deep cock drilling
mature sex galleries women
Naked mistresses make guy feel the hardest pain
celebrities naked
Drunken blonde eats cum after getting nailed doggystyle and face-fucked by her lewd boyfriend
drunk orgies


Related Video Collections

All Comments

Anyone know of movies(big hits/"B"etc--not XXX)--with male genital torture, castration or penis severing?
Just curious. Are there any movies beyond the 3 I know of, Teeth, Last House On The Left (orig) and Hostel II, that show male genital mutilation, castration and/or penis severing of any kind? Thanks
"I spit on your grave"
"Next Friday"
Infant genital torture--why is it in the Bible, commanded by God?
Sure, under the New Testament circumcision is no longer required, but why was it required in the first place? And plenty of Christians, especially in the US, still do it. Jews and Muslims still do it. Why? What is it about religion it wants to point something sharp at your crotch, anyway?

And for those that say it's more sanitary or some such nonsense, why not cut off your baby's ears so you don't have to clean them? In fact, is there any doubt that if the Bible said to cut off your baby's ears, it's a sign of the covenant. that people would do it, and say "It's more sanitary" and "They won't remember it"?

One last question on the topic--why is female genital mutilation a human rights issue but male genital mutilation is seen as "normal"?
If I link you to the video, I will be reported for "Adult Content" even though it is nothing more than a documentary on the topic of Male circumcision...

So I will tell you how to get there...

Go to (Yes, just type in and search this exact term "Penn Teller circumcision".

There you will find streaming sources to the episode.

You can get episode details here, at the P&T Episode Guide:

Circumcision is pointless for 99% of males... ONLY the United States continues to routinely circumcise its ...

The "Reasons" for it are MYTHS...

Hygiene? WE HAVE SOAP! Take 5 seconds in the shower each day to pull back the foreskin and WASH YOUR PENIS!

STD's? The ONLY thing that has been documented is that there is a "Slightly Elevated Risk" of getting HPV if you are not circumcised. Since 50% of all humans HAVE one of the many, many forms of HPV, you have a 53% risk of getting it instead of 50%... The big question becomes, WHY THE HELL ARE YOU NOT USING A CONDOM??

The ONLY reason for Circumcision is when SOME men get Glansie, a tightening of the foreskin caused by a tight preputial ring, a band of fibrous tissue at the end of the foreskin, which can lead to tearing and scar tissue making sexual activity painful. This happens to a small minority of men and is NOT something that "All" men need to worry about.




If all the NONSENSE about Circumcision were true, why doesn't the rest of the planet do it? Do ALL of their men have HPV? Do ALL of their men get Glansie? Do ALL of their men have such a build up of smegma that their penis turns to brie?

NO! The very idea is retarded...

MOST circumcisions are done WITHOUT ANESTHETIC! People claim that the infant's nervous system isn't developed enough to feel the pain of the act...

NONSENSE! The baby doesn't cry because it is going in to SHOCK from the horrible pain!

RESEARCH people!

H the topic before you spread misinformation that is not backed up by legitimate science.
How do you feel about a law that forbids infant male genital mutilation?
Reasons why

1. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis having more than 20,000 nerve endings compared to a clitoris with only 8,000.

2. It violates a 's rights because it's done without his consent

3. No, religion isn't an excuse because it's the opium of mankind

4. Mutilating and torturing infants is a crime against humanity!
I feel good about that!
Is infant male genital mutilation the root of misogyny?
FIRST, visit here:…

Quote: "It wasn't until I became the mother of a son that I thought of circumcision as the root of all evil"or at least the root of misogyny. How could they not grow up and stomp us under their boots after we allow such a hideous, agonizing torture to be inflicted on their freshly born little bodies?"
Not sure if I agree with that...but I do agree that circumcision is the worst thing that you can do to your . When is the U.S. going to wake up?
What is your opinion on torture?
Do you think it is necessary in certain occasions or that it doesn't have a place in our democracy.
I recently say a picture on or something like that. The pictures were horrible. They had dogs trained to attack the genitals of prisoners in the Abu Ghraib prison. The site also had a heart sickening video of a young 14 year old male raped in front of his parents. The parents cried and scream while they beat the prison gaurds beat the and raped him.
We've never done it.
Why is circumcision still legal in modern liberal states?
Human sacrifice? Nope.
Animal sacrifice? Nope.
Torture? Nope
Stoning? Nope
Female genital mutilation? Nope.
Male genital mutilation? ...yes?

Please help me. I don't understand why parents who circumcise their aren't either punished or labelled as unfit parents by governments that are established to protect against harms towards non-consenting individuals. Regardless of unsubstantiated health benefits, isn't it far safer to err on the side of non-mutilation till the scientific community is a bit more together on this one?
In my opinion, yes, it is safer to err on the side of non-circumcision.

It's becoming more common for hospitals to NOT circumcise infants, especially in areas with high immigrant populations.

But there are valid religious beliefs that require circumcision. And there are many parents who want it done for cosmetic or cultural reasons.

I doubt it will be illegal in the US in my lifetime. Probably not even in my 's lifetimes. Too many people want it done.

So I really think that the focus should be less on making it illegal and more on ensuring that infants who undergo the surgery receive adequate anesthesia (many don't), and that parents know that it's okay to not have their sons circumcised.

But that's unlikely to happen since there appears to be a slight decrease in incidence of STDs in circumcised men. And public health organizations are jumping on that and promoting circumcision.

I wouldn't circumcise my sons, unless there was a seriously compelling reason to do so. Sometimes it is required for medical reasons, and I'd be okay with that. And if my husband was a devout Jew or Muslim, I'd consider it.
Why is male circumcision accepted in today's society, but female circumcision regarded as barbaric?
Both are types of genital mutilation. The only difference is, one if performed on males and the other is performed on females. So why is it viewed as acceptable for young boys to be circumcised, but not young girls? Is this some perverse form of sexism?

For those of you who are not entirely sure about the procedure of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), here is a quick description of the two most common types (accounting for approximately 90% of all FGM):
1. Clitoridectomy: partial or total removal of the clitoris (a small, sensitive and erectile part of the female genitals) and, in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoris).
2. Excision: partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora (the labia are "the lips" that surround the vagina).

According to a medical article on Female Genital Mutilation:
"FGM is recognized internationally as a violation of the human rights of girls and women. It reflects deep-rooted inequality between the sexes, and constitutes an extreme form of discrimination against women. It is nearly always carried out on minors and is a violation of the rights of . The practice also violates a person's rights to health, security and physical integrity, the right to be free from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and the right to life when the procedure results in death."

How comes FGM is seen as a violation of the human rights of females, but male circumcision is seen as a perfectly normal and acceptable procedure? There have been many studies on male circumcision and despite the general consensus that it's healthier and more hygienic to be circumcised, none have provided conclusive evidence to support this. Furthermore, there are risks with every medical procedure and male circumcision can result in bleeding, infection, loss of sensation and erectile dysfunction later on in life.

So, I'm interested to hear your opinions on this matter. Do you agree or disagree with infant circumcision (both male and female) and why/why not?
It always makes me laugh to see pro-circumcision advocates try to use the excuse of penis cleanliness to justify the procedure, it may have been the case a few century's ago due the fact that they didn't have running water back then. However nowadays we have SHOWERS, If I want to keep my todger clean then all I have to do is pull my foreskin back and wash all the cheese off. Or do the circumcision advocates think that I can't be trusted to do that?

As for the religious reasons, if God gave me a foreskin when he created me only to want my parents to have it cut off when I was born. Then God must either be very indecisive or he must be one sadistic f***.

I'm completely against circumcision either way male or female, their is nothing unhygienic about the male foreskin given our modern circumstances and the invention of showers, they can be washed in seconds. I believe that every individual should have the same rights to an intact body, male or female. To infringe on a persons bodily liberties and modify their body against their will is sickening in my opinion.

As for the shallow people who think it's 'ugly' or 'disgusting' then tough s***, I'm not modifying my body just so that my penis pleases you aesthetically.
Was the Sexual Torture at Abu Gharib a Hint at what Republicans were doing behind closed doors?
Remember there were mostly males and assaults on young boys; naked bodies piled on bodies with the bums showing; closeup photos and dogs targeting genitalia. Was all this for the purpose of generating secret photos to stimulate sick minds of the leaders in the Republican party who want you to ignore what your eyes see and vote for them in the upcoming election?
I don't think I'd go nearly that far. I'd say that it was just indicative of the Republican leadership's lack of concern for other people. As long as they stay powerful, they don't really care what happens to others.
What does it mean when you dream of a snake torturing its prey?
I had a dream where a snake sprung at an animal like a deer and was killing it slowly. The snake attacked the male animal's genitals. Weird. Any Ideas?
By psychology it means un-full-filled sex desire.
More and more these days, females are squeezing male's testes to solve issues more than . Why?
Girls younger and younger these days are being taught about the male's vulnerability to stop an agression from a male. The problem with this, is the knowledge is getting out of hand. Now you dont have girls just grabbing balls to stop a . You got girls walking up and sack tapping dudes for fun. You got girls squeezing to inflict pain and humiliation for dissing a girlfriend. You got girls punching boys there just to get a reaction. This idea of teaching girls to hit males in the balls and violate a man's privates to get the upper hand is causing females to think it is always ok. No real harm done unless she goes too far and castrates or damages them. Well who deamed females the judge jury and executioner by allowing this? I think it is a sick direction that human society is heading towards when girls think they can cuase 1000 times more pain on a male that tried to a female then what she would have received. Girls think men dont suffer from trauma emotionally when thier balls are pummeled. If the guy wasn't even successful at penetration against her will because she got a hold of his jewels, how can she justify not only just hurting him momentarily to get away, but to now torture her assailant by using an abuse of force and possibly causing death? Why are girls taught today that any form of agression equals possible death so it justifies killing the attempted (and I reitterate...attempted) ? And why aren't females taught in these self defense classes that they can also cause death if torturing the assailant by inflicting horrendous and agonizing pain to the male this way by bringing on Nuerogenic shock? Girls are hitting and kicking and squeezing for reasons that have nothing to do with a guy hurting a female in thier genitals. You think I am joking or overexaggerating? See this youtube video:
If you think that's new, you really haven't been paying attention.

Free male genital torture Tube Videos